![]() ![]() Gunman wrote: In 2008, Richard Baukham wrote a book entitled "Jesus and the eyewitnesses" where he argues the traditional authorship of the four Gospels-that they were written by Mark, John, Matthew and Luke. ![]() Many implications in the Gospel of Mark that they were based on Peter's testimony (the author constantly singles out Peter when referring to the apostles). Luke telling us that he based his Gospel on eyewitness testimonies John telling us that he was a disciple in his Gospel the testimony of Iranueus (whose teacher, from what I've heard, was a contemporary of the disciples) the testimony of Papias (who was alive and grown up at the time some of the Gospels were written) Second, while I am not familliar with the arguments offered within the book itself, I know what the traditional arguments in favor of Gospels as eyewitness testimony are, so I would like to hear what the standard counter-arguments are. Has anyone here read it, and what do you think? ![]() In 2008, Richard Baukham wrote a book entitled "Jesus and the eyewitnesses" where he argues the traditional authorship of the four Gospels-that they were written by Mark, John, Matthew and Luke.įirst, I have not read the book (yet), but I've heard that it has managed to persuade a large number of scholars. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |